Design Decisions Matrix for Stick-to-Skin Devices

Optimize your stick-to-skin device design based on your specific application requirements with our comprehensive selection guide

Adhesive Type
Skin Compatibility
Adhesion Strength
Removal Ease
Cost
Best Applications
Limitations
Silicone-Based

EXCELLENT

Hypoallergenic, gentle removal

GOOD

Moderate-strong adhesion

EXCELLENT

Pain-free removal

HIGH

$$$

Extended wear devices, sensitive skin, pediatric/geriatric Higher cost, potential for edge lifting in high-moisture environments
Acrylic-Based

GOOD

Generally well-tolerated

EXCELLENT

Very strong adhesion

FAIR

May require adhesive remover

LOW

$

Active patients, short-term wear, high-stress applications Potential irritation, aggressive removal, sensitization risk
Hydrocolloid

EXCELLENT

Breathable, moisture-managing

GOOD

Swells with moisture

GOOD

Gentle, self-releasing

MEDIUM

$$

Wound care, high-exudate applications, extended wear Limited electronic integration, thickness, moisture-dependent performance
Wear Duration
Recommended Adhesive
Backing Material
Key Design Considerations
Typical Applications
Regulatory Focus
Hours (1 - 24)

Acrylic or Medical-grade pressure-sensitive

Polyurethane film, Non-woven fabric

Easy application, cost optimization, immediate adhesion

Surgical monitoring, procedure-specific patches, diagnostic tests

510(k) Simplified, Basic Biocompatibility

Days (1 - 7)

Silicone or Modified acrylic

Breathable polyurethane, MVTR-optimized films

Moisture management, edge integrity, comfort optimization

Continuous glucose monitoring, cardiac patches, wound dressings

510(k) Standard, Extended Contact Testing

Days (7 - 30)

Advanced silicone systems

Multi-layer constructions, reinforced edges

Long-term biocompatibility, skin health maintenance, secure attachment

Implantable sensor interfaces, chronic monitoring systems

PMA Pathway, Chronic Contact Studies

Activity Level
Mechanical Stress
Adhesive Requirements
Design Features
Testing Requirements
Cost Impact
Sedentary (Limited Mobility)

LOW

Minimal stretching/movement

Standard adhesion strength, comfort-focused

Thin profile, breathable materials, easy application

Basic peel testing, skin irritation assessment

LOW

$

Active (Daily Activities)

MEDIUM

Regular movement, some sweating

Enhanced adhesion, moisture resistance

Flexible backing, sweat-proof edges, reinforced attachment

Dynamic peel testing, moisture exposure, wear simulation

MEDIUM

$$

Sports/Athletic (High Intensity)

HIGH

Extreme stretching, heavy perspiration

Maximum adhesion strength, waterproof performance

Ultra-flexible materials, advanced edge sealing, impact resistance

Extreme condition testing, sports-specific validation, durability studies

HIGH

$$$

Population
Skin Characteristics
Design Priorities
Material Considerations
Regulatory Requirements
Special Testing
Pediatric (0 - 17 years)

Thinner, more sensitive, rapid growth

Gentle adhesion, colorful/fun design, parent-friendly application

Hypoallergenic silicones, latex-free, smaller sizes

Pediatric Study Plan, Age-specific labeling

Pediatric skin model testing, age-appropriate usability studies

Adult (18 - 64 years)

Normal thickness, variable sensitivity, active lifestyle

Performance optimization, lifestyle integration, cost-effectiveness

Standard medical-grade adhesives, versatile backing materials

Standard 510(k), CE Mark

Standard biocompatibility panel, real-world use validation

Geriatric (65+ years)

Fragile, thin, slower healing, medications affect skin

Minimal trauma removal, high visibility design, caregiver-friendly

Ultra-gentle silicones, fragile skin-specific formulations

Elderly-specific studies, Medication interaction assessment

Fragile skin testing, medication interaction studies, caregiver usability

Cost Component
Low-Cost Option
Mid-Range Option
Premium Option
Performance Trade-Offs
Volume Considerations
Adhesive Materials

Basic acrylic $0.10-0.25/unit

Modified acrylic/Silicone blend $0.25-0.60/unit

Advanced silicone systems $0.60-1.50/unit

Skin compatibility vs. adhesion strength vs. removal gentleness

Economies at 100K+ units/year

Backing Materials

Standard PU film $0.05-0.15/unit

Breathable films/Non-wovens $0.15-0.35/unit

Multi-layer engineered films $0.35-0.80/unit

Comfort vs. moisture management vs. durability vs. flexibility

Custom materials require 500K+ units

Manufacturing Complexity

Simple die-cut patches $0.20-0.40/unit

Multi-layer lamination $0.40-0.80/unit

Electronics integration $2.00-10.00/unit

Functionality vs. complexity vs. quality control requirements

Automation viable at 1M+ units/year

Regulatory / Testing

Basic biocompatibility $50-100K total

Extended testing panel $100-250K total

Clinical studies required $250K-1M+ total

Time to market vs. regulatory risk vs. clinical evidence strength

One-time cost spread over product lifetime


Assumptions & METHODOLOGY

This design decision matrix provides comprehensive guidance for stick-to-skin medical device development based on industry standards, clinical requirements, and manufacturing benchmarks as of 2024. Recommendations synthesize data from adhesive manufacturers, contract manufacturing partners, regulatory submissions, and real-world clinical applications across multiple device categories. Adhesive Performance Parameters: Adhesive classifications (silicone-based, acrylic-based, hydrocolloid) reflect medical-grade materials meeting ISO 10993 biocompatibility standards. Performance ratings (Excellent/Good/Fair) are derived from comparative testing data including peel strength (ASTM D3330), shear adhesion resistance, and skin reaction studies. Cost ranges ($0.10-1.50/unit) assume 25cm² device footprint with medical-grade certification and represent volume pricing at 100,000 units annually. Wear Duration Specifications: Duration categories (Hours: 1-24, Days: 1-7, Days: 7-30) align with FDA contact duration classifications and typical clinical applications. Adhesive recommendations and backing material specifications are based on moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR) requirements ranging from 500-1200 g/m²/24hr. Regulatory pathway guidance reflects current FDA 510(k) and PMA requirements with associated biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993 standards. Activity Level Assessments: Mechanical stress categories (Low/Medium/High) incorporate data from accelerometer studies and sweat exposure testing. Design features and testing requirements scale with anticipated patient activity, from sedentary post-surgical recovery through high-intensity athletic applications. Cost impacts reflect additional material and testing requirements for enhanced durability. Population-Specific Adaptations: Age-based categories account for dermatological differences in skin thickness, healing rates, and sensitivity. Pediatric specifications include 25-30% adhesion reduction for gentle removal, while geriatric considerations incorporate fragile skin protocols and medication interaction factors. Regulatory requirements reflect FDA guidance for age-specific labeling and testing protocols. Cost Structure Modeling: Component costs represent 2024 market pricing from qualified medical device suppliers in North America and Europe. Manufacturing complexity tiers assume ISO 13485-certified facilities with appropriate clean room classifications. Volume considerations incorporate equipment amortization schedules and economies of scale achievable at different production levels. Regulatory and testing costs reflect typical expenditures for US market entry, excluding clinical study variability based on specific indications. All specifications represent industry benchmarks and typical ranges. Actual performance, costs, and requirements will vary based on specific device design, intended use population, manufacturing location, supplier relationships, and regulatory strategy. Recommendations should be validated through application-specific testing and consultation with qualified suppliers and regulatory professionals.

Content Card - Just Mighty - Boyd - Two Color - Full (1920 x 1080)
Logo - Just Mighty - White Logo (400 x 400)

Your innovation Just Might change the world. But the odds are against you. We help you turn Just Might into Just Mighty.